Novos links

Fundación Friedrich A. von Hayek (Argentina) com vários blogs temáticos

Alguns artigos:
- “Notes on Hayek´s Epistemic Basis for Political Competition” de Alejandra Salinas
- “Hayek y la Psicología Teórica I La interpretación relacional del ‘orden sensorial” de Esteban Leiva e Pastor Montoya
- “Hayek y la psicología teórica II: Algunas consecuencias filosóficas para la teoría social” de Esteban Leiva e Pastor Montoya
- “El Orden Sensorial de F. A. Hayek:Desde la psicología teórica hacia el conocimiento económico” de David Ortiz
- “El derecho desde la perspectiva de la Escuela Austríaca de Economía. La visión de
Friedrich A. von Hayek” de Ricardo Manuel Rojas
- “Reflexiones acerca del ideario neoliberal: Un análisis de las estrategias discursivas de F. Hayek” de Ileana P. Beade
- “El proceso de globalización bajo una perspectiva hayekiana” de Adrián Osvaldo Ravier
- “Una breve visita a los conceptos hayekianos fundamentales” de Constanza Mazzina
- “La teoría jurídica de Friedrich A. von Hayek: sus antecedentes y aportes epistemológicos a la teoría jurídica” de Eliana M. Santanatoglia
- “Hayek: El orden espontáneo en las sociedades post comunistas en transición” de John Gray
- “Hayek y la investigación histórica: Algunas reflexiones” de Ezequiel Gallo
- “Contra Keynes y Cambridge” de Jesús Huerta de Soto

El presente texto se publicó como «Nota Introductoria» a la edición española de Contra Keynes y Cambridge: Ensayos, Correspondencia, volumen IX del mismo título de las Obras Completas de F. A. Hayek, Unión Editorial, Madrid 1996.

Allí se presenta la polémica que Hayek y Keynes mantuvieron a lo largo de los años treinta. Considerando que en 1996 se ha cumplido el cincuenta aniversario del fallecimiento del economista inglés y que sus doctrinas, aunque hoy en gran medida han caído en el descrédito, todavía no han sido sustituidas en el ámbito de la macroeconomía por un cuerpo de teoría coherente de general aceptación, es incuestionable la gran oportunidad e importancia que tiene el retomar el estado de la cuestión allí donde Hayek lo dejara en su duelo con Keynes y el resto de los teóricos de Cambridge antes de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Este trabajo también ha sido publicado como el capítulo 4 del libro “Nuevos Estudios de Economía Política”, Unión Editorial, Madrid, España.

“La teoría del ciclo económico de Friedrich von Hayek: causas monetarias, efectos reales” de Rebeca Gómez Betancourt

blog Notes on Hayekian Social Thought de Federico Sosa Valle

Opportunity Discovery, Entrepreneurial Action, and Economic Organization (II)

A propósito deste artigo leiam este post de Peter Klein.

The Austrians Have Mises All Wrong

“The Austrians Have Mises All Wrong!” e “Towards a Critique of Hayek’s Economics and Knowledge” de Matthew Mueller

Mises objected to equilibrium theory as a matter of principle. Mises attacked economics by rejecting the idea that equilibrium is a state towards which we should be tending; and he did this on two grounds. First of all, equilibrium is not an identifiable state. Therefore, approximations to and deviations from this “hypothetical” state cannot be measured or talked about intelligently. This is where the Austrians are wrong. How can we say that the market is a process approximating equilibrium if we can never know the definite monetary and quantity values of such a state? And secondly, equilibrium theorizing is fundamentally opposed to human action. Equilibrium reduces man to a vegetative existence. Human action would not exist in equilibrium.

The Road to Serfdom

Uma versão actualizada da versão em cartoons de “The Road to Serfdom” de Hayek.

Economic Liberty Lecture Series: Austrian Economics and the Present Crisis

A Foundation for Economic Education disponibliza a particpação de Peter Boettke nas “Economic Liberty Lecture Series” em que este analise a presente crise finaceira na perpsctiva da Escola Economica Austriaca.

Money, Capital, and Fluctuations: Early Essays

Recensão de Roger Garrisson do livro “Money, Capital, and Fluctuations: Early Essays” de F.A.Hayek

The Mundane Economics of the Austrian School

“The Mundane Economics of the Austrian School” de Peter Klein

Ver post no Organizations and Markets.

While I agree . . . that the Austrian tradition is part of a larger, liberal movement, I argue here that Austrian economics is nonetheless a distinct kind of economic analysis, and that the essence of the Austrian approach is not subjectivism, the market process (disequilibrium), or spontaneous order, but what I call mundane economics—price theory, capital theory, monetary theory, business-cycle theory, and the theory of interventionism. Call this the “hard core” of Austrian economics. I argue that this hard core is (1) distinct, and not merely a verbal rendition of mid-twentieth-century neoclassical economics; (2) the unique foundation for applied Austrian analysis (political economy, social theory, business administration, and the like); and (3) a living, evolving body of knowledge, rooted in classic contributions of the past but not bound by them

The Concise Encycolpedia of Economics

“The Concise Encycolpedia of Economics” editada por David R. Henderson.

Em português

Artigos no Ordem Livre

“O uso do conhecimento na sociedade” de Friedrich Hayek (“The Use of Knowledge in Society”)
“Por que não sou conservador” de Friedrich Hayek (“Why am I Not A Conservative”)
“A irresistível força da competição no mercado” de Israel Kirzner (“The Irresistible Force of Market Competition”)

Hayek e a “Grande Depressão”

“Did Hayek and Robbins Deepen the Great Depression?” de Lawrence White

Contrary to some accounts, the Hayek-Robbins (“Austrian”) theory of the business cycle did not prescribe a monetary policy of “liquidationism” in the sense of passive indifference to sharp deflation during the early years of the Great Depression. There is no evidence that Hayek or Robbins influenced any “liquidationist” in the Hoover administration or the Federal Reserve System. Federal Reserve policy during the Great Depression was instead influenced by the real bills doctrine, which (despite some apparent similarities) was diametrically opposed in key respects to Hayek’s norms for central bank policy.